Impact of sheltered openers in life of Pakistan cricket

Discussion in 'Cricket Talk' started by Energy, May 23, 2012.

  1. Offline

    Energy

    Joined: Apr 22, 2012
    Posts: 6,941
    Likes: 6,356
    Points: 113
    Impact of sheltered openers in life of Pakistan cricket

    by Hassam Chaudhry
    23rd May 2012



    [IMG]

    For any team, any format or any surface, the opening batsmen are defined as two sets of imperative individuals who set the tone for the entire game. The sport of cricket has envisaged an aggressive change over the last decade but amidst the attacking approach appointed by many batsmen at all positions, the importance of a stable and a steady opening pair is still as vital as it has been forever.

    Closer to home, Pakistan has been highly infamous with regards to the continuous shuffle in opening combinations after the departure of Saeed Anwar and Aamer Sohail, and the art of opening the batting has supposedly been the one of the weakest links in the batting line-up for years, often causing panic in the ranks. Throwing in players into the limelight at the sport's highest form of discipline and skill is an attribute that is associated exclusively with Pakistan and while it has fashioned many a great bowling legends, despondently the swindle has worked little wonders in the opening department. Over the last decade, Pakistan has tried no less than 57 opening combinations in order to integrate a similar level of stability to the batting facility but most have gone rather in vain.

    Starting with the early part of the century, there were a staggering amount of no less than 35 yearly opening combinations tried in 96 innings between the year 2000 and 2005, resulting in an overall team win/loss ratio of 1.73, with the standout year being 2003 where the newly formed duo of Imran Farhat and Taufeeq Umar gave a glimpse of hope to the entire nation as they moulded into a complimenting and striking duo with an incredible partnership average of 72 in 7 innings together including three mighty stands over the 100 run mark. However, the contentment was to be short-lived as controversies and brisk slump in form saw the pair being disengaged summarily.

    The radical impact it had on the team results was instant. For the next half of the decade, Pakistan witnessed an even lesser overall team win/loss ratio of 0.70 between the years 2006 and 2010. No surprise guesses here at all as the think-tank started on a then never-ending journey to find the right opening combination yet again. With a mere total of 5 stands of over 100, 21 different yearly opening combinations were tried in the 75 innings and the entire method of operation was surely but steadily starting to turn comical across global eyes, when came in another glimpse of hope, and this time, fortunately it was to remain.

    [IMG]
    Since taking hold of proceedings in 2010, and following the spot-fixing controversy, Mohammed Hafeez and Taufeeq Umar have struck up to be one of the more stable test opening combinations to have come out of Pakistan....ever. The results therefore speak for themselves, as Pakistan have enjoyed an extremely healthy overall team win/loss ratio of 6.00 in the year 2011. The duo has come out together on 23 occasions and have a partnership average of just over 43 with 3 stands of over 100 respectively. To summarize, this was the first instance in over a decade that Pakistan persisted with a single opening combination for the entire year and while the variation percentages have reached close to an embarrassing 50% over the years, there is a sense of anticipation that the figure will remain at a decline for the years to follow.

    While the information sounds extremely positive, lets remind ourselves that this is Pakistan cricket and each day brings in a new chapter in the life of players, at times for the cost of complete contradiction. Looking forward to the upcoming tour to Sri Lanka, one can safely assume the burden of towering expectations on the pair once again to grit out under the sun and put in the long hours. As well-wishers of the nation, we can only hope that the current opening duo will continue to walk out together and shine for Pakistan on numerous further occasions and ultimately bring the opening hunters to the ground for some time.
  2. Offline

    Mercenary

    Joined: Dec 17, 2009
    Posts: 11,323
    Likes: 3,739
    Points: 113
    Great work as always by @Energy

    I fully agree with you about stable openers leading to better performance as a team. However im not sure the W/L ratio was the right indicator, you should have used opening partership averages.
    Energy likes this.
  3. Offline

    Energy

    Joined: Apr 22, 2012
    Posts: 6,941
    Likes: 6,356
    Points: 113
    @Mercenary, yes the partnership averages are always the best indicator but I wanted to strike out a different perspective to this.

    Would love to hear more thoughts on this. Are our openers the batting success to our current test team?
    1137moiz likes this.
  4. Offline

    ehtesham

    Joined: Sep 10, 2011
    Posts: 9,482
    Likes: 2,860
    Points: 113
    great work @Energy bro, keep it up :)

    as stats show, that sticking to single opening pair has resulted in increase of winning ratio n it has risen to 60% but as i've said before n i still believe that stats don't really tell the complete story.

    talking about wins n losses, numerous things have to be kept in mind such as quality of opposition, pitches etc etc. persisting with taufiq n hafeez might have resulted in winning but imho we've mainly been beating the sides courtesy great performances from saeed ajmal n abdul REHMAN, moreover we've mostly been playing on placid tracks for last 2 years against ordinary attacks which also has a huge role in making these stats look better.
    Energy likes this.
  5. Offline

    Energy

    Joined: Apr 22, 2012
    Posts: 6,941
    Likes: 6,356
    Points: 113
    @ehtesham, I'll agree the role of the bowlers cannot be taken for granted. But its always good to see a settled opening pair at the top of things.
  6. Offline

    ehtesham

    Joined: Sep 10, 2011
    Posts: 9,482
    Likes: 2,860
    Points: 113
    yeah its good but the test will surely come when they get to play in alien conditions.
  7. Offline

    BoomBoom786

    Joined: Apr 12, 2010
    Posts: 1,035
    Likes: 252
    Points: 83
    Taufeeq Umar did well in New Zealand as well when they toured

    Hafeez is the bigger concern when it comes to the longer version of the game

    However, both have been a breath of fresh air as we have found a stable & reliable opening combination at long last. Long may it continue.
  8. Offline

    shahrukh619

    Joined: Apr 28, 2010
    Posts: 12,047
    Likes: 1,429
    Points: 113
    Fully agree with this. Taufeeq and Hafeez have been wonderful openers in the test lately, and i think we have finally got the best opening pair in test.
  9. Offline

    zeenix

    Joined: Dec 17, 2009
    Posts: 5,443
    Likes: 398
    Points: 83
    A good effort @Energy

    I would attribute this better level of success to consistency of selection over-all. And offcourse Opening is very much part of that over-all lineup. It helps when the Captain and the players are sure of what they want to do. Consistency helps develop the Captain's trust on a particular person in the team. And it also helps the player himself when he is not all the time fighting for his place in the team. Our middle order has also been pretty much consistent in terms of selection. Our problem with openers have always been because of our mentality. We have never been able to segregate the difference of approach in different formats. Not everyone can adapt to different formats with repeating success. I have always been a fan of Taufeeq Umar and i felt that he had the right temperament that was required of an international opener. Unfortunately our likes for swashbuckling batters dominated our thinking and Taufeeq fell out of favor. Similarly i was averse to the idea of Taufeeq opening in ODI's, the way i don't support Azhar Ali in ODI or T20. Similar to Kawa chala Hans ki chal apni chal bhi bhool gaya.
    Energy likes this.
  10. Offline

    WaQaReD!

    Joined: Sep 13, 2011
    Posts: 2,439
    Likes: 2,152
    Points: 113
    i would say the openers are vital to the batting success of any team. they build the base and lay the foundation. lose your openers early and the plan has to change, the middle order batsman have to face the newer ball so theres more risk of losing wickets and they have to start building the innings again and cannot play their natural game usually slowing the run rate down(if it is a limited overs game).
    very very few good sides lack good openers.
    NO 1 AFRIDI FAN likes this.
  11. Offline

    iZaman

    Joined: Apr 23, 2012
    Posts: 1,813
    Likes: 1,546
    Points: 113
    Great write-up although I am not very fond of this opening pair.
    Lets see if they can perform equally good in non-subcontinental situations.